4.7 Article

Barriers to outdoor physical activity and unmet physical activity need in older adults

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 106-111

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.020

关键词

Aging; Mobility; Outdoor environment

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Culture in Finland
  2. Academy of Finland, the Future of Living and Housing (ASU-LIVE) program
  3. Academy of Finland [257239, 251723]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [251723, 257239, 257239, 251723] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To profile participants based on reported outdoor physical activity barriers using a data-driven approach, describe the profiles and study their association with unmet physical activity need. Method. Cross-sectional analyses of 848 community-dwelling men and women aged 75-90 living in Central Finland in 2012. Barriers to outdoor physical activity and unmet physical activity need were enquired with a questionnaire. The latent profiles were identified by profiling participants into latent groups using a mixture modeling technique on the multivariate set of indicators of outdoor physical activity barriers. A path model was used to study the associations of the profiles with unmet physical activity need. Results. Five barrier profiles were identified. Profile A was characterized with minor barriers, profile B with weather barriers, profile C with health and weather barriers, profile D with barriers concerning insecurity, health and weather; and profile E with mobility and health barriers. The participants in the profiles differed in the proportion of individual and environmental barriers. The risk for unmet physical activity need was highest among people whose severe mobility difficulties restricted their outdoor physical activity. Conclusion. Outdoor physical activity barriers reflect the imbalance in person-environment fit among older people, manifested as unmet physical activity need. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据