4.7 Review

Addressing cancer control needs of African-born immigrants in the US: A systematic literature review

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 89-99

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.006

关键词

African immigrants; Cancer; Cancer prevention; Systematic literature review

资金

  1. Clinical and Translational Science Award [2012-5]
  2. Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Baccalaureate Training in Breast Cancer Health Award [PBTDR12228366]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, African immigrants have worse cancer outcomes. However, there is little research about cancer behaviors and/or interventions in this growing population as they are generally grouped with populations from America or the Caribbean. This systematic review examines cancer-related studies that included African-born participants. We searched PsycINFO, Ovid Medline, Pubmed, CINHAL, and Web of Science for articles focusing on any type of cancer that included African-born immigrant participants. Twenty articles met study inclusion criteria; only two were interventions. Most articles focused on one type of cancer (n = 11) (e.g., breast cancer) and were conducted in disease-free populations (n = 15). Studies included African participants mostly from Nigeria (n = 8) and Somalia (n = 6). However, many papers (n = 7) did not specify nationality or had small percentages (<5%) of African immigrants (n = 5). Studies found lower screening rates in African immigrants compared to other subpopulations (e.g. US-born). Awareness of screening practices was limited. Higher acculturation levels were associated with higher screening rates. Barriers to screening included access (e.g. insurance), pragmatic (e.g. transportation), and psychosocial barriers (e.g. shame). Interventions to improve cancer outcomes in African immigrants are needed. Research that includes larger samples with diverse African subgroups including cancer survivors is necessary to inform future directions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据