4.7 Article

Bicycle boulevards and changes in physical activity and active transportation: Findings from a natural experiment

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 S74-S78

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.006

关键词

Bicycling; Walking; Longitudinal; Natural experiment; Neighborhood; Built environment; Infrastructure

资金

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Active Living Research program [67127]
  2. Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC) [446]
  3. U.S. Department of Transportation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. This study evaluates changes in physical activity and active transportation associated with installation of new bicycle boulevards. Methods. This natural experiment study uses data from a longitudinal panel of adults with children (n = 353) in Portland, OR. Activity and active transportation outcomes were measured with GPS and accelerometers worn for up to 5 days in 2010-11 and 2012-13. The effect of the treatment was estimated using difference in differences estimation and multivariate regression models. Results. In five of the seven models, the interaction term was not significant, indicating that after controlling for the main effects of time and exposure separately, there was no correlation between being in a treatment area and minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day, bicycling >10 mm, walking >20 min, minutes of walking (if >20), or making a bike trip. Significant covariates included rain, being female, living closer to downtown, and attitudes towards bicycling, walking, and car safety. Conclusion. This study could not confirm an increase in physical activity or active transportation among adults with children living near newly installed bicycle boulevards. Additional pre/post studies are encouraged, as well as research on the length of time after installation that behavior change is likely to occur. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据