4.7 Article

Evolution of cervical cancer screening and prevention in United States and Canada: Implications for public health practitioners and clinicians

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 426-433

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.020

关键词

HPV; Screening; Vaccination; North America; US and Canada

资金

  1. Abbott Molecular
  2. Becicton-Dickinson
  3. Copan
  4. Digene-Qiagen
  5. Genomica
  6. Gen-Probe
  7. Greiner Bio-One
  8. GSK/GSK biologicals
  9. Graceway pharma/Medicis
  10. Hologic
  11. IncellDx
  12. Innogenetics NV
  13. Laboratoire Biron
  14. Marubeni
  15. Merck/Merck Sharp Dohme
  16. MTM laboratories
  17. NeoDiagnostix
  18. Roche molecular systems
  19. Warnex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Declines in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Canada and in the United States have been widely attributed to the introduction of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. This article reviews changes in screening and introduction of HPV vaccination. Method. Sentinel events in cervical cancer screening and primary prevention through HPV vaccination in the US and Canada are described. Results. Despite commonalities, cervical cancer screening and prevention differ between the two countries. Canada has a combination of opportunistic and organized programs at the provincial and territorial level, while the US has opportunistic screening and vaccination systems. In the US, the HPV test along with the Pap test (co-testing) is part of national recommendations for routine cervical cancer screening for women age 30 and older. Co-testing is not being considered anywhere in Canada, but primary HPV testing is currently recommended (but not implemented) in one province in Canada. Conclusion. Many prevention strategies are available for cervical cancer. Continued public health efforts should focus on increasing vaccine coverage in the target age groups and cervical cancer screening for women at appropriate intervals. Ongoing evaluation will be needed to ensure appropriate use of health resources, as vaccinated women become eligible for screening. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据