4.7 Review

The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: An exploration of inconsistent findings

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 241-251

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017

关键词

neighborhood; safety; crime; fear; physical activity; walking; built environment

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP0455453]
  2. Australian Research Council Postgraduate Award
  3. NHMRC Research Fellowship [503712]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP0455453] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Personal safety is commonly cited in qualitative research as a barrier to local walking, yet the relationship between safety and constrained physical activity has received mixed support in quantitative studies. This paper reviews the quantitative evidence to date, seeking to explain the inconsistencies, and offers recommendations for future research. Methods. A social-ecological framework was adopted to explore the evidence linking crime-related safety, and factors that influence real and perceived safety, with constrained physical activity. Results. Perceived safety tends to affect the physical activity of groups already known to exhibit greater anxiety about crime: and some elements of the built environment that influence safety appear to constrain physical activity. However the evidence is somewhat inconsistent, and this may be partly attributed to measurement limitations. Many studies employ generic safety measures that make implicit references to crime or use composite variables that lack specificity. Physical activity outcomes also require consideration, as only activities occurring locally outdoors are likely to be affected by neighborhood crime. Conclusions. Further research is required to tease out associations between real and perceived crime-related safety and physical activity, ideally employing behaviour and crime-specific measures, and addressing the moderating role of the social and built environments. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据