4.7 Article

Sustainability of health and lifestyle improvements following a non-dieting randomised trial in overweight women

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 593-599

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.08.008

关键词

Lifestyle change intervention; Non-dieting; Relaxation response; Maintenance; Prevention of weight gain; Wellbeing

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Laurenson Award
  3. Otago University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To compare three non-dieting interventions that focused on lifestyle change rather than weight loss, in terms of the sustainability of improvements in lifestyle behaviors, psychological well-being and medical symptoms at 2 years. Method. In Dunedin, New Zealand in 2002/2003, 225 obese/overweight women (BMI >= 28; 25-68 years) participated in a randomised, intention-to-treat trial comparing two group programs (P1, P2) and a self-guided mail-delivered program (P3). Only P1 included intensive relaxation response training. All three non-dieting interventions involved a 10-week program, followed by an eight-month support phase. Participants completed baseline, 1-year and 2-year assessments. Outcomes included behavioral, psychological and medical symptom measures and a composite success score. Results. 118 participants completed the 2-year follow-up. Only among P1 participants were the reductions in psychological distress and medical symptoms achieved at 1 year, also maintained at 2 years. At 2 years, P1 participants had significantly greater increases in stress management behaviors than those in P2 (p<0.05), and significantly greater success scores than those in P3 (p<0.05). In all three programs, mean weight was unchanged at 2 years. Conclusion. Inclusion of relaxation response training in a healthy lifestyle program facilitates long-term maintenance of psychological and medical symptom improvements even in the absence of weight loss. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All right reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据