4.4 Article

Fetal ductal constriction caused by maternal ingestion of green tea in late pregnancy: an experimental study

期刊

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 921-926

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pd.3933

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNPq (National Council of Technological and Scientific Development)
  2. FAPERGS (State of Rio Grande do Sul Agency for Research Support)
  3. FAPICC (Institute of Cardiology Fund for Research and Culture Support), Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that experimental maternal intake of green tea in late pregnancy causes fetal ductus arteriosus constriction, probably because of prostaglandin inhibition. Methods and Results Twelve fetal lambs (pregnancy>120days) were assessed before and after maternal administration of green tea (n=8) or water (n=4; controls) as the only source of liquid. After 1week, echocardiography showed signs of constriction of the ductus arteriosus in all fetuses from mothers ingesting green tea, with increase in mean systolic velocity(from 0.70+/-0.19m/s to 0.92+/-0.15m/s, 31.4%, p=0.001) and mean diastolic velocity (0.19+/-0.05m/s to 0.31+/-0.01m/s, 63.1%, p<0.001), decrease of pulsatility index (2.2+/-0.4 to 1.8+/-0.3, 22.2%, p=0.003) and increase of mean right ventricular/left ventricular diameter ratio (0.89+/-0.14 to 1.43+/-0.23, 60.6%, p<0.001). In the four control fetuses, there were no significant changes. All lambs exposed to green tea also showed at autopsy dilated and hypertrophic right ventricles, which was not present in control fetuses. Histological analysis showed a significantly larger mean thickness of the medial avascular zone of the ductus arteriosus in fetuses exposed to green tea than in controls (747.6+/-214.6 mu m vs 255.3+/-97.9 mu m, p<0.001). Conclusions This study in fetal lambs shows a cause and effect relationship between experimental maternal exposure of green tea and fetal ductus arteriosus constriction in late pregnancy. (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据