4.4 Article

Genome-wide array-based copy number profiling in human placentas from unexplained stillbirths

期刊

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
卷 31, 期 10, 页码 932-944

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2817

关键词

stillbirth; copy number variants; deletion syndromes; duplication syndromes; fetal death

资金

  1. NIH [DP2OD001500-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Accumulating evidence suggests that genomic structural variations, particularly copy number variations (CNV), are a common occurrence in humans that may bear phenotypic consequences for living individuals possessing the variant. While precise estimates vary, large-scale karyotypic abnormalities are present in 6-12% of stillbirths (SB). However, due to inherent limitations of conventional cytogenetics, the contribution of genomic aberrations to stillbirth is likely underrepresented. High-resolution copy number variant analysis by genomic array-based profiling may overcome such limitations. Methods Prospectively acquired SB cases >22 weeks underwent classification of 'unexplained' stillbirth by Wigglesworth and Aberdeen criteria after extensive testing and rigorous multidisciplinary audit. Genome-wide analysis was conducted using high-resolution Illumina single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays (Human CNV370-Duo) on placental and fetal samples. Potential alternate detection methods were completed by one or more of three independent means (quantitative PCR, Illumina1M, or Agilent105K comparative genomic hybridization arrays). Results In our cohort of 54 stillbirths, 29 met strict unexplained criteria. Among these, we identified 24 putative novel CNVs. Subsequent interrogation detected 18 of 24 CNVs (75%) in placental samples, 8 of which were also confirmed in available fetal samples; none were present in maternal blood. Conclusion We describe the potential of whole-genome placental profiling to identify small genomic imbalances, which might contribute to a small proportion of well-characterized, unexplained stillbirths. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据