4.4 Article

Non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal trisomy 18 by RNA-SNP allelic ratio analysis using maternal plasma SERPINB2 mRNA: a feasibility study

期刊

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 1031-1037

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2340

关键词

Edwards syndrome; non-invasive prenatal diagnosis; prenatal screening; circulating fetal RNA; single nucleotide polymorphism

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [CUHK471307]
  2. Li Ka Shing Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidies has been achieved by measuring the ratio of two alleles of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in circulating placental mRNA (the RNA-SNP allelic ratio approach) in maternal plasma. We investigated the feasibility of applying this approach for the non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal trisomy 18. Method We targeted serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), membrane 2 (SERPINB2) mRNA, which is transcribed from chromosome 18 and is preferentially expressed by the placenta. We developed a mass-spectrometric assay to measure the SERPINB2 RNA-SNP allelic ratios in the placental samples and maternal plasma obtained from pregnancies involving euploid and trisomy 18 fetuses. Results We were able to separate all the euploid and trisomy 18 placentas by their SERPINB2 RNA-SNP allelic ratios. The allelic ratios of the trisomy 18 placentas deviated from the reference interval established from the euploid placentas. Due to the relatively low concentrations of SERPINB2 mRNA in maternal plasma, we used pooled maternal plasma samples for analysis. We were able to identify three of the four pooled trisomy 18 plasma samples by their deviated allelic ratios when compared with the reference interval obtained from pooled euploid plasma samples. Conclusion It is feasible to detect fetal trisomy 18 non-invasively by maternal plasma SERPINB2 RNA-SNP analysis provided that sufficient quantities of plasma samples are used. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据