4.5 Article

Precambrian evolution of the Lhasa terrane, Tibet: Constraint from the zircon U-Pb geochronology of the gneisses

期刊

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 64-77

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2013.09.006

关键词

Geochronology; Precambrian; Magmatism and metamorphism; Tectonic evolution; Lhasa terrane; Tibet

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41230205, 41202035, 40921001, 40972055]
  2. Geological Survey Project of Geological Survey of China [1212011121269]
  3. Outlay Research Fund of Institute of Geology, CAGS [J1203]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [J1203] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Lhasa terrane in south Tibet was traditionally considered as the northern margin of the Gondwana Indian continent. However, the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Lhasa terrane remains poorly constrained. In this paper, we report zircon geochronology and Ti-in-zircon thermometer for the metamorphic rocks from the eastern segment of the Lhasa terrane. The studied three gneisses underwent the amphibolite-facies and granulite-facies metamorphism. Most zircon grains from two gneisses have a structure of core-mantle-rim. The magmatic cores of the zircon yielded the protolith ages of 1784 +/- 25 Ma and 1782 +/- 31 Ma; the overgrowth mantles of the zircon yielded the metamorphic ages of 618 +/- 3 Ma and 604 +/- 69 Ma; the metamorphic rims of the zircon from one sample yielded an age of 23.2 +/- 0.3 Ma. Zircon grains from other gneiss have a structure of core-mantle-rim. The mantles of the zircon yielded a metamorphic age of 1117 +/- 29 Ma. These data show that the Lhasa terrane witnessed Late Paleoproterozoic magmatism, and three episodes of metamorphism in the Late Mesoproterozoic, Late Neoproterozoic and Cenozoic. This results show that the Lhasa terrane and the Indian continent have similar Precambrian tectonic evolution, which was related to the amalgamation of supercontinents Columbia, Rodinia and Gondwana. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据