4.5 Article

Neoproterozoic high-K granites produced by melting of newly formed mafic crust in the Huangling region, South China

期刊

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 93-107

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2013.04.011

关键词

High-K granite; Crustal reworking; Neoproterozoic; South China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Huangling igneous complex in the central Yangtze Block, South China, consists of the 850-Ma tonalite and trondhjemite which were intruded by the 826+/-13 Ma high-K granite. The granites are composed of plagioclase (30-60%), alkali feldspar (10-30%), quartz (20-30%), biotite (<10%) and hornblende (<5%). Both hornblende and biotite have high Ti and low Al contents, indicating high liquidus temperature. The granites have high SiO2 (63.1-73.3 wt.%), K2O (2.58-4.79 wt.%) and Na2O (3.90-5.89 wt.%) and low MgO (0.49-1.78 wt.%) and are magnesian alkali-calcic in composition. Their chondrite - normalized REE patterns are characterized by enrichment of LREE (La/Yb-N = 14.5-32.8) and mostly negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu*= 0.5-1.1). They have moderately high Sr (202-698 ppm) and low Y (6.13-18.7 ppm) with Sr/Y ratios of 14-64. These large elemental variations probably resulted from fractional crystallization. They also have negative whole rock epsilon Nd (-9.75 to -11.73) and zircon epsilon Hf values (-7.1 to -15.8) which are similar to those of the Neoproterozoic mafic rocks in the same region, suggesting that the granites may have been produced by melting of newly-emplaced mafic rocks. Tonalites and trondhjemites of the Huangling complex previously were considered as products by differentiation of water-rich basaltic magmas and melting of the thickened Archean continental crust in an arc setting, respectively. Therefore, the crustal growth and reworking of the Yangtze Block were probably wholly controlled by the subduction system which resulted in formation of the stable continent during the Neoproterozoic. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据