4.7 Article

Flow of Eyring-Powell dusty fluid in a deferment of aluminum and ferrous oxide nanoparticles with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 340, 期 -, 页码 68-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.015

关键词

Variable viscosity; Aluminum oxide nanoparticles; Magnetohydrodynamic; Cattaneo-Christov heat flux; Dust particles; Thermal radiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is a speculative investigation of the magnetohydrodynamic flow of Eyring-Powell liquid under suspension of nano-particles and dust. A simulation is executed by fraternization of Ferrous oxide (Fe3O4) and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) nanoparticles in Eyring-Powell dusty fluid. Dispersion of ferrous oxide (Fe3O4) and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) nano-particles in dusty fluid have applications in heat exchanger system, biocompatibility, biosensors, nuclear reactor heating process, detection and cancer treatment, in monitoring stem cells differentiation etc. Ferrous oxide (Fe3O4) and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) mixtures are substantially useful in optimizing the heat transport occurrences. Implementation of similarity variables leads to the systems of ordinary differential expressions. These nonlinear systems of ODEs are tackled with the use of Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg Scheme (RKFS). The analysis of dimensionless temperature and velocity fields is given via plots. The numerical benchmarks of friction-factors and heat transport rate are for different constraints are given and examined. Obtained results are matched with previously published material and noted to be satisfactory. This model expresses that the rate of heat transportation is more in aluminum oxide nanofluid compared to ferrous oxide nanofluid with existing of viscous variation parameter. The presence of thermal and momentum slips correspond the enhancement in local Nusselt number in case of ferrous oxide nanoparticles when compared to aluminum oxide nanoparticles. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据