4.7 Article

Effects of external particles on the liquefaction property of natural gas in a Laval nozzle

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 339, 期 -, 页码 894-902

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.08.077

关键词

Natural gas; Laval nozzle; External particles; Heterogeneous condensation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274232]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018MEE004]
  3. Graduate Innovation Project of China University of Petroleum [YCX2018067]
  4. Source Innovation Plan Application Basic Research Project of Qingdao City [17-1-1-88-jch]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [17CX02064A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to study the effects of external particles on the supersonic condensation process of natural gas, an experimental system to test the supersonic condensation efficiency is set up and the models for spontaneous (homogeneous) and heterogeneous condensation of natural gas are established. Vapor and liquid flow control equations are derived based on the two-fluid Euler model, and internally consistent classical theory and Gyarmathy's model are used to calculate the droplet nucleation rate and growth rate respectively. The results show that the due to the inhomogeneous condensation caused by the external particles, the measured droplet radius is larger, but the number of droplets is smaller in the experiment. With the increase of external particle concentration, the spontaneous condensation is gradually suppressed and heterogeneous nucleation is becoming more and more obvious. The increase of external particles concentration is beneficial to the condensation and the total humidity becomes larger, but when the external particle concentration increases to a certain value, the promotion effect is limited. In addition, other parameters such as the radius of particles also have influence on the heterogeneous condensing flow of natural gas. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据