4.7 Article

Multifractal breakage patterns of thick maltodextrin agglomerates

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 440-446

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.047

关键词

Breakage; Digital image analysis (DIA); Multifractal analysis; Lacunarity; Thick maltodextrin agglomerate (MDA)

资金

  1. CONACyT-Mexico [84287]
  2. SIP-IPN [20131595]
  3. CONACYT
  4. IPN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breakage of food materials affects operations in industry such as storage, transport and quality control, and has an influence on sensorial attributes. However, the geometry of the breakage pattern is a complex and rarely studied subject. Maltodextrin has been used as an ingredient in food related systems. The aim of this work is to characterise the geometry of the breakage patterns in thick maltodextrin agglomerates (MDAs), by digital image analysis (DIA) and multifractal spectra. Results showed that morphology of the breakage pattern was independent of the powder particle size, agglomerate thickness and compaction force. On the other hand, significant differences in pattern's lacunarity were found between the different loads applied whereas different distributions of the irregularity of the breaking pattern measured from the centre to the border of the MDA were obtained. Multifractal spectra reported different generalised fractal dimensions and shapes. Therefore, the breakage profile has a heterogeneous shape with microstructural differences along the breakage line. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that multifractal analysis has been used to characterise the breakage pattern geometry in thick MDAs. Size distributions of residual particles (RP) generated during the fracturing process were correlated with the breakage pattern of the material. This study contributes to the quantitative analysis and understanding of the complex structure of the breakage pattern and provides valuable information for further research on brittle food products. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据