4.7 Article

Tuning of energy gap, microstructure, optical and structural properties of Cr doped Zn0.96Cu0.04O nanoparticles

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 157-164

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.03.013

关键词

Zn-0.96 (-) xCu0.04CrxO nanoparticles; Co-precipitation; X-ray diffraction; Optical property; FTIR spectra

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India [41-968/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zn0.96-xCu0.04CrxO nanoparticles with different Cr concentrations from 0 to 4% were successfully synthesized by co-precipitation method. The X-ray diffraction pattern showed the crystalline nature with hexagonal wurtzite structure. The diminution in activation energy and the enhanced strain by Cr-doping from 0 to 3% reduced the average crystal size from 27 to 23.8 nm while the formation of secondary phase such as spinel ZnCr2O4 enhanced it to 25.6 nm after Cr 3% via increasing the activation energy. The solubility limit of Cr in the present system is fixed as 3%. The energy dispersive X-ray spectra confirmed the presence of Cu and Cr in Zn-O. The optical absorption spectra showed the three distinct bands corresponding to UV region (305-324 nm) due to electronic transition between the bands; blue region (382-386 nm) mainly due to the Zn/Cr interstitials and bluish green (481-482 nm) region due oxygen vacancies and interstitials. The noticed poor transmittance throughout the region and the broader absorption bands in Cr = 1% doped Zn0.96Cu0.04O confirmed that it had more defects such as oxygen vacancies, Zn interstitials and other defects. The blue shift of energy gap from 3.68 eV (Cr = 0%) to 3.71 eV (Cr = 1%) was due to the creations of more defects. The red shift of E-g from 3.71 eV (Cr = 1%) to 3.6 eV (Cr = 3%) was explained by sp-d exchange interactions between the band electrons and the localized d-electrons of the Cr3+ ions. Presence of chemical bonding was confirmed by FTIR spectra. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据