4.7 Article

Control of hematite nanoparticle size and shape by the chemical precipitation method

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 249, 期 -, 页码 353-359

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.08.042

关键词

Magnetic nanoparticles; Size-controlled hematite; Chemical precipitation method; Electrical conductivity; Superparamagnetic behavior

资金

  1. Petroleum and Petrochemical College
  2. Conductive and Electroactive Polymers Research Unit of Chulalongkorn University
  3. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  4. Royal Thai Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) nanoparticles were synthesized from the ferrihydrite precursor via a simple chemical precipitation method with trace amounts of Fe(II) as the catalyst under nitrogen atmosphere. The characteristic of the synthesized hematite particles were evaluated by XRD, FT-IR, and FE-SEM. The magnetic and electrical properties were studied by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) and an electrometer, respectively. The synthesized products were of a single phase of the hexagonal structure hematite without any other impurities. The physical morphology of the synthesized hematite appears to be composed of a large number of very small particles appearing as the raspberry shape. The particle size of the synthesized hematite can be successfully controlled at 50-150 nm, appearing as three different morphologies: the spherical-like, the cubic-like, and the ellipsoidal shape, through adjusting the synthesis conditions. The smallest particle possesses the highest electrical conductivity of 5.2 x 10(-3) s/cm. On the other hand, the largest particle exhibits weak ferromagnetism and the highest saturation magnetization (M-s) of 1.94 emu/g, is higher than that of the smaller particle, which possesses the super-paramagnetic behavior. Furthermore, the different particle shapes are shown here to critically affect the electrical and magnetic properties of the nanoparticles. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据