4.7 Article

Modeling the influence of a process control agent on the properties of metal matrix composite powders using artificial neural networks

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 26-35

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.045

关键词

Mechanical alloying; Artificial neural networks; Powder metallurgy

资金

  1. Karadeniz Technical University Research Fund [2007.112.10.2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An artificial neural network (ANN) model was developed for modeling the effect of the amount of a process control agent (PCA) on the apparent density, particle size and microhardness of Al-10 wt.%Al2O3 composite powders. Methanol was used as the process control agent in varying amounts of 1, 2, and 3 wt.% to investigate the effect of the PCA on the properties of the composite powders. Composite powders were fabricated using high energy planetary ball milling, and the training data for the ANN were collected from experimental results. After the training process, the experimental data were used to verify the accuracy of the system. The properties of the composite powders were analyzed using a hall flowmeter for the apparent density, a laser particle size analyzer for the particle size, a microhardness tester for the powder microhardness and a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for the powder morphology. The two input parameters in the proposed ANN were the amount of methanol and duration of the milling process. Apparent density, particle size and microhardness of the composite powders were the outputs obtained from the proposed ANN. As a result of this study the ANN was found to be successful for predicting the apparent density, particle size and microhardness of Al-Al2O3 composite powders. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for the predicted values didn't exceed 4.93%. This model can be used for predicting Al-Al2O3 composite powder properties produced with different amounts of methanol and using different milling times. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据