4.7 Article

Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 206, 期 3, 页码 269-282

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.09.030

关键词

Rolling friction; Rolling resistance; Discrete element method; Granular material; Granular flow; Sandpile; Angle of repose

资金

  1. EPSRC [GR/T23541]
  2. Scottish Funding Council for the Joint Research Institute
  3. Heriot-Watt University
  4. University of Edinburgh
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/T23558/01] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particulate systems are of interest in many disciplines. They are often investigated using the discrete element method because of its capability to investigate particulate systems at the individual particle scale. To model the interaction between two particles and between a particle and a boundary, conventional discrete element models use springs and dampers in both the normal and tangential directions. The significance of particle rotation has been highlighted in both numerical studies and physical experiments. Several researchers have attempted to incorporate a rotational torque to account for the rolling resistance or rolling friction by developing different models. This paper presents a review of the commonly used models for rolling resistance and proposes a more general model. These models are classified into four categories according to their key characteristics. The robustness of these models in reproducing rolling resistance effects arising from different physical situations was assessed by using several benchmarking test cases. The proposed model can be seen to be more general and suitable for modelling problems involving both dynamic and pseudo-static regimes. An example simulation of the formation of a 2D sandpile is also shown. For simplicity, all formulations and examples are presented in 2D form, though the general conclusions are also applicable to 3D systems. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据