4.7 Article

Effects of flavonoids-rich Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) pulp extracts on glucose consumption in human HepG2 cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 144-153

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.01.030

关键词

Myrica rubra pulp; Flavonoids; LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS; Glucose consumption; Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside; Quercetin-3-O-glycosides

资金

  1. Special Scientific Research Fund of Agricultural Public Welfare Profession of China [201203089]
  2. National Project of Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs Funded by the Ministry of Science & Technology of China [2012BAD33B08]
  3. Program of International Science and Technology Cooperation [2014DFE30050]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014XZZX004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flavonoids composition of Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) pulp extracts was characterized by LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS and quantification of flavonoids in nine bayberry cultivars was carried out by HPLC. As a result, five flavonoids, i.e. cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C-3-Glu), myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside (M-3-Rha), quercetin-3-O-galactoside (Q-3-Gal), quercetin-3-Oglucoside (Q-3-Glu), and quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (Q-3-Rha) were identified and quantified. The glucose consumption activities of nine bayberry cultivars varied significantly among cultivars and they were well correlated with their total phenolics, total flavonoids contents, and DPPH scavenging activities. In addition, C-3-Glu and three quercetin-3-O-glycosides (Q-3-Glys, i.e. Q-3-Gal, Q-3-Glu, and Q-3-Rha), but not M-3-Rha, showed significant enhancement of glucose consumption in HepG2 cells. There were significant correlations between the glucose consumption activity with the contents of C-3-Glu and the sum of three Q-3-Glys, respectively. These results showed that bayberry cultivars with high content of C-3-Glu and Q-3-Glys may have great potential as hypoglycemic foods. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据