4.7 Article

Evaluation of flocs resistance and reflocculation capacity using the LDS technique

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 183, 期 2, 页码 231-238

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.07.024

关键词

floe resistance; light diffraction spectroscopy (LDS); mass fractal dimension; reflocculation; polyelectrolytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a previous paper we have shown the added value of using LIDS to monitor flocculation. It can supply, simultaneously, information on floes size and structure and enlighten flocculation kinetics and mechanisms. In this paper, LDS is applied to study deflocculation and reflocculation processes of precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) induced by cationic polyacrylamides, when different types of shear forces are applied. LIDS can detect the influence of polymer characteristics and concentration as well as of the type of shearing, on floes resistance and reflocculation degree, which depend on floes structure and on the type of bonds between particles. As expected, flocs formed by bridging mechanism reflocculate with difficulty while floes formed by patching reflocculate to a higher degree. Flocs resulting from reflocculation are more compact than the original ones, as assessed by the mass fractal dimension. Reflocculation is also lower when the floes are submitted to superficial shearing than when they are submitted to sonication. Shearing induced by sonication is sufficient to break down the floes in many fragments while the increase of pump speed only detaches particles by erosion, at the floes surface, where bonds are weaker. Results prove that LIDS is useful to monitor deflocculation and reflocculation processes and to predict floe resistance under different conditions. Moreover,, the whole study demonstrates the benefit of using LIDS for a complete evaluation of flocculants performance in the different stages of flocculation: aggregation, stabilization, deflocculation and reflocculation. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据