4.7 Article

Whole transcriptome analysis of the pectoralis major muscle reveals molecular mechanisms involved with white striping in broiler chickens

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 590-601

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey429

关键词

muscle disorder; breast myopathy; RNA-Seq

资金

  1. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA) [01.11.07.002.04.03]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [407404/2013-9]
  3. CNPq at Embrapa
  4. BJT [373167/2012-1]
  5. CNPq [301453/2014-4]
  6. FAPESC/Capes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White striping (WS) is one of the most common myopathies identified in broiler chickens leading to substantial production losses, where the incidence reaches 12% in commercial chickens. It occurs primarily in heavier chickens being a modification of the breast muscle characterized by the presence of pale parallel streaks in the same orientation of the muscle fibers. Since the WS etiology remains unclear, we aimed to identify the biological and genetic mechanisms involved in its occurrence through the whole transcriptome analysis of WS in affected and unaffected chicken breast muscles. A total of 11,177 genes were expressed in the pectoralis major muscle. Out of those, 1,441 genes were differentially expressed (FDR <= 0.01) between the two analyzed groups, being, respectively, 772 genes upregulated and 669 downregulated in the WS affected group. A total of 36 significantly overrepresented GO terms related to WS myopathy were enriched, and the most relevant biological processes were activation of immune system, angiogenesis, hypoxia, cell death, and striated muscle contraction. The unbalance of those biological processes may trigger the occurrence of the WS phenotype in broilers. The possible lack of capillary blood supply homogeneously in the muscle triggers the hypoxia, following the activation of glycolysis, calcium signaling and apoptosis related genes facilitating the tissue damage and WS incidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据