4.7 Article

Identification of reliable reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in lung and heart of pulmonary hypertensive chickens

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 97, 期 11, 页码 4048-4056

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey258

关键词

broiler chicken; housekeeping gene; normalization; real-time PCR

资金

  1. Applied Research Centre, Vice Chancellor for Research of Shahrekord University [36879/B55]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate normalization in real-time quantitative PCR is an important step in quantification of gene transcription pattern, in which proper application of stable reference gene(s) is crucial. To identify the most stable reference gene (s) in pulmonary hypertensive chickens, from a panel of 9 typical candidate genes, the expression of ACTB, HMBS, HPRT1, RPL13, RPL32, 18SrRNA, TBP, TFRC, and YWHAZ was determined in the lung and heart (right ventricle) of both healthy and cold-induced pulmonary hypertensive chickens at 42 d of age. The BestKeeper, geNorm, and NormFinder software programs were used to analyze this set of genes. Also, the ratio of right ventricle to the total ventricle was used as an index of induced pulmonary hypertension, which increased in the cold-treated chickens compared to the control at 42 d of age. Candidate reference genes ranking in the lung of pulmonary hypertensive chickens vs. healthy individuals included RPL13, YWHAZ, HMBS, ACTB, HPRT1, TFRC, RPL32, 18SrRNA, and TBP; those in the heart were YWHAZ, RPL13, HMBS, ACTB, HPRT1, TBP, 18SrRNA, TFRC, and RPL32; and those in the heart-lung combination included RPL13, YWHAZ, HMBS, HBRT1, TFRC, ACTB, 18SrRNA, RPL32, and TBP. The overall results showed that the most stable genes are YWHAZ, RPL13, HMBS, ACTB, HBRT1, TFRC, TBP, RPL32, and 18SrRNA, respectively. In addition, the combination of YWHAZ, RPL13, and HMBS is recommended as the reference gene panel for more accurate quantitative data normalization of heart or lung in the chicken pulmonary hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据