4.7 Article

Effect of cold storage and 1-MCP treatment on ethylene perception, signalling and synthesis: Influence on the development of the evergreen behaviour in 'Conference' pears

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 212-220

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.07.003

关键词

ACC; ACO; ACS; Chilling; Ethylene receptors; Gene expression

资金

  1. University of Lleida

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To further understand the response of 'Conference' pears to 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment and their ability to restore ripening after prolonged periods of cold storage, fruit were treated with 0, 300 nL L-1 1-MCP or 300 nL L-1 exogenous ethylene plus 600 nL L-1 1-MCP prior to storage. Changes in ethylene, ethylene precursors (ACC, MACC), ethylene-related enzyme activities (ACS, ACO) together with their transcript levels, and the expressioii of four ethylene receptors and one Raf kinase protein from the ethylene signalling pathway, were monitored before and after cold storage and during subsequent ripening at 20 degrees C. 1-MCP treatment acted on the ethylene pathway in two differentiated phases. In a first initiation occurring during cold storage, the 1-MCP treatment limited the up-regulation of both PcACS1 and PcACO1 observed in control fruit and promoted an up-regulation of PcETR1 leading to a complete inhibition of ACO activity during cold storage. These regulations resulted in fruit unable to produce ethylene upon removal and promoted the second phase (maintenance phase). This second phase was characterized by a dawn-regulation of PcACS1 and PcACS4 as well as PcACO1 together with a clear up-regulation of PcETR5 and better maintenance of PcCTR1 transcript levels, which were partially reversed with exogenous ethylene treatment. All these different regulations led in turn to a complete inhibition of the ripening processes, which may partially explain the occurrence of the evergreen behaviour in 'Conference' pear during shelf-life. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据