4.7 Article

Rapid 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment and delayed controlled atmosphere storage of apples

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 24-31

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.02.010

关键词

Malus x domestica Borkh; Storage; Ethylene; Firmness; Physiological disorders; Carbon dioxide injury

资金

  1. AgroFresh, Inc.
  2. Federal Formula Funds [NE1036]
  3. NY Apple Research and Development Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quality of 'McIntosh' and 'Empire' apples [Malus x sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] after treatment with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and delayed controlled atmosphere (CA) storage has been investigated. For each cultivar, fruit from three orchard blocks were harvested in two growing regions. 1-MCP was applied after overnight cooling to 2 degrees C and CA conditions applied 2,7 and 14d after harvest. Quality of fruit was assessed after CA storage for 6 months plus 1 and 7 d at 20 degrees C. 1-MCP suppressed the internal ethylene concentrations (IECs) of the fruit during the 14 d period before CA conditions were applied, but the extent of suppression was lower in fruit with high IECs at harvest. Untreated fruit of both 'McIntosh' and 'Empire' exposed to CA storage after 2d maintained firmness levels similar to 1-MCP treated fruit, but only for 1 d of shelf life. 1-MCP treatment resulted in firm fruit after delayed CA up to 14d, but the most consistent effects were found in 'Empire' which has lower IECs than 'McIntosh'. Orchard block differences in IEC affected the persistence of 1-MCP effects on firmness. Effects of 1-MCP treatment on storage disorders were inconsistent, although slight increases in risk of external carbon dioxide injury were detected. Rapid treatment of fruit with 1-MCP after harvest can afford storage operators more freedom to delay CA storage application, but attention to cultivar, fruit maturity and susceptibility of fruit to storage disorders must be considered. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据