4.7 Article

Testing of a local approach for the prediction of quality parameters in intact nectarines using a portable NIRS instrument

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 130-135

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.12.006

关键词

NIR spectroscopy; Nectarine; Portable sensor; Quality parameters; LOCAL algorithm

资金

  1. Andalusian Regional Government [P09-AGR-5129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nectarine sector requires rapid, economical and non-destructive methods for monitoring physical-chemical quality changes taking place not only during fruit development and at harvest, but also postharvest, thus allowing fruit quality to be evaluated at any stage in the commercial chain from grower to consumer. The use of sensors based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) technology, in conjunction with chemometric data treatment models, has already been studied for this quality-control purpose in nectarines. The critical challenge is to develop robust and accurate mathematic models based on hundreds of highly heterogeneous nectarine samples in order to represent the large natural variability of the fruit. This paper evaluates and compares the performance of MPLS regression and a local regression method for the prediction of major quality parameters including size (weight and diameter), flesh firmness and soluble solids content (SSC), in nectarines representing different harvests and crop practices. The results showed that the LOCAL algorithm offered no advantages over MPLS regression for the prediction of SSC and diameter, and only slight benefits in weight determination. For firmness evaluation, however, application of the LOCAL algorithm yielded a major improvement, reducing the standard error of prediction (SEP) by 27%, increasing the coefficient of determination (r(2)) by 44% (from 0.47 to 0.68), and reducing bias by 88.5% (from 6.95 N to 0.80 N). Thus, use of the LOCAL algorithm proved to be valuable in minimizing the error in NIRS models for predicting a parameter as complex as firmness. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据