4.7 Article

Effects of ethylene on volatile emission and fragrance in cut roses: The relationship between fragrance and vase life

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 245-252

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.09.008

关键词

Aroma; Ethylene; Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG); 1-Methylcyclopropane (1-MCP); Rosa hybrida; Silver thiosulphate (STS); Longevity

资金

  1. American Floral Endowment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between fragrance and vase life and the role of ethylene on volatile emission in cut rose flowers was investigated. No relationship was observed between the amounts of volatile compounds emitted and vase life when fragrant and non-fragrant rose cultivars were compared. Neither ethylene production nor respiration rate of flowers was directly related with vase life. Volatile production during vase life was differential and independent among volatiles originating from different biosynthetic groups. Ethylene did not play a role in the regulation of volatile emission in rose flowers. Endogenous ethylene production was very low in most of the cultivars and did not show autocatalytic production trends. Volatile emission patterns during vase life did not parallel endogenous ethylene production. Exogenous ethylene exposure had differential effects among all cultivars, regardless of the fragrance of the flower. Fragrant cultivar 'Osiana' was highly sensitive to exogenous ethylene, with petals abscising within 24 h of ethylene (1 mu L L-1) exposure while other fragrant cultivars 'Erin' and 'Lovely Dream' had low ethylene sensitivity. Volatile production was unaffected by exogenous ethylene. The results of this study indicate that volatile emission in cut roses is not regulated by endogenous or exogenous ethylene and occurs independently of petal senescence and/or abscission. These results provide a better understanding of the complexity of volatile emission in rose flowers. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据