4.7 Article

The gladiolus GgEXPA1 is a GA-responsive alpha-expansin gene expressed ubiquitously during expansion of all floral tissues and leaves but repressed during organ senescence

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 48-56

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.05.006

关键词

Gladiolus; Expansin; Cell expansion; Gibberellin; Promoter; GUS

资金

  1. Indian National Science Academy
  2. Department of Biotechnology, India
  3. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The final shape and size of the flower is genetically and developmentally controlled by tight regulation of cell number and cell size with cell expansion playing an important role The gladiolus expansin gene, GgEXPA1, was expressed prominently during phases of active tepal expansion and cell elongation in stamen filaments, gynoecium styles and expanding leaves but not in tissues where expansion had ceased and senescence had been initiated. Within tepals, differential expression between the proximal and distal portions that differ in cell elongation was observed. The expression of the gene was responsive to GA and inhibited by the GA biosynthesis inhibitor, paclobutrazol. The promoter of GgEXPA1 showed strong expansion-responsive GUS expression in young agro-infiltrated gladiolus tepals and in etiolated hypocotyls and light grown expanding cotyledonary leaves of transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings. Inhibition of hypocotyl elongation by paclobutrazol blocked the expression of the promoter-driven reporter gene indicating GA responsiveness of the promoter. GgEXPA1 provides an interesting example of a single expansin gene being involved in expansion processes in different plant tissues such as tepals, stamens, pistils and leaves that are both spatially as well as temporally distinct in their development. The studies provide a basis for GA mediated expansion of floral organs via expansins prior to anthesis. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据