4.5 Article

A Systematic Assessment of Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Saxagliptin Drug Development Program for Type 2 Diabetes

期刊

POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 16-27

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2010.05.2138

关键词

cardiovascular outcomes; CV death; DPP-4 inhibitors; myocardial infarction; saxagliptin; stroke; type 2 diabetes mellitus

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Duke Health System
  3. Medtronic Japan
  4. Merck and Company
  5. National Institutes of Health
  6. Pfizer
  7. Regado Biosciences
  8. Adolor Corp
  9. Alexion
  10. Amgen Inc.
  11. Amylin Inc.
  12. Argolyn
  13. AstraZeneca
  14. Bayer HealthCare
  15. Boehringer Ingelheim
  16. Brigham & Women's Hospital
  17. CardioKinetix Inc.
  18. Cierra
  19. Cordis
  20. Daiichi Sankyo
  21. Duke University School of Medicine
  22. Edwards Lifesciences
  23. Eli Lilly
  24. Elsevier (AHJ)
  25. Forest Laboratories
  26. Genentech
  27. GlaxoSmithKline
  28. Guidant Corporation
  29. Innocoll Pharmaceuticals
  30. Johnson Johnson
  31. KCI Medical
  32. Luitpold Pharmaceutical
  33. Medtronic Inc.
  34. Momenta Pharmaceutical
  35. Novartis
  36. Portola Pharmaceutical
  37. Proctor and Gamble
  38. Pozen
  39. sanofi-aventis
  40. Schering-Plough Corp.
  41. Scios Inc.
  42. Medicines Company
  43. WebMD
  44. William Beaumont Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective was to assess the relative risk (RR) for cardiovascular (CV) events across all 8 randomized phase 2/3 trials evaluating saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, revascularization procedures, and cardiac ischemia) were reported by investigators through standard adverse event reporting procedures and were systematically identified. Post hoc blinded adjudication of all deaths, MIs, and strokes was performed using prespecified endpoint definitions by an independent clinical events committee (CEC). Results: A total of 4607 randomized and treated patients (n = 3356 treated with saxagliptin [2.5-100 mg/d]; n = 1251, comparator [n = 656, placebo; n = 328, metformin; n = 267, uptitrated glyburide]) were included. The median ages were 54 years (saxagliptin) and 55 years (comparator) (interquartile range, 47-61 each); 51% were female, 73% were white, 52% were hypertensive, 44% had hypercholesterolemia, 39% had a smoking history, 20% had a first-degree family member with premature coronary heart disease, and 12% had prior CV disease. Cardiovascular events were experienced by 61 patients (38 [1.1%], saxagliptin; 23 [1.8%], comparator), and CV death/MI/stroke events were reported by investigators in 41 patients: 23 (0.7%), saxagliptin; 18 (1.4%), comparator (relative risk, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 [0.24-0.82]). The CEC reviewed 147 patients with potential CV events and identified a total of 40 patients with CV death/MI/stroke: 22 (0.7%), saxagliptin; 18 (1.4%), comparator (RR, 0.43 [0.23-0.80]). Component proportions for CV death, MI, and stroke were (saxagliptin vs comparator): 7 (0.2%) vs 10 (0.8%), 8 (0.2%) vs 8 (0.6%), and 11 (0.3%) vs 5 (0.4%), respectively. Conclusion: No increased risk of CV death/MI/stroke was observed in patients randomly assigned saxagliptin across a broad drug development program. Although this systematic overview has inherent and important limitations, the data support a potential reduction in CV events with saxagliptin. The hypothesis of CV protection with saxagliptin will be tested prospectively in a large randomized clinical outcome trial evaluating saxagliptin compared with standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk for CV events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据