4.6 Review

Value of biomarkers in osteoarthritis: current status and perspectives

期刊

POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 90, 期 1061, 页码 171-178

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-203726rep

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondazione Fondazione Italiana Ricerca Malattie Ossee (F.I.R.M.O.)
  2. Merck Sharpe Dohme
  3. Nycomed
  4. Roche
  5. Glaxo
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Wyeth
  8. Procter and Gamble
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. IBSA
  11. Theramex
  12. Novartis
  13. Pfizer
  14. Rottapharm
  15. Servier
  16. Chugai-Roche
  17. Amgen
  18. UCB
  19. Bioiberica
  20. Wyeth-Ayerst
  21. Novo Nordisk
  22. Proctor and Gamble
  23. Groupe Fournier
  24. Besins EscoVesco
  25. MSD
  26. Chiesi
  27. Boehringer Mannheim
  28. Alliance for Better Bone Health
  29. Glaxo Smith Kline
  30. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  31. Lilly
  32. Will Pharma
  33. Procter Gamble
  34. Abbott
  35. Cargill
  36. Tanabe Research Laboratories
  37. AstraZeneca
  38. Boehringer Ingelheim
  39. Elanco
  40. Ferring
  41. Merck
  42. TRB Chemedica
  43. Virbac
  44. AbbVie
  45. Bristol Myers Squibb
  46. Merckle
  47. NPS
  48. Genevrier
  49. Teijin
  50. Teva
  51. Ebewee Pharma
  52. Zodiac
  53. Analis
  54. Novo-Nordisk
  55. Medical Research Council [MC_U147585819, MC_UU_12011/1, MC_UP_A620_1014, U1475000001, MC_U147585824] Funding Source: researchfish
  56. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10082, NF-SI-0513-10085] Funding Source: researchfish
  57. MRC [MC_U147585819] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoarthritis affects the whole joint structure with progressive changes in cartilage, menisci, ligaments and subchondral bone, and synovial inflammation. Biomarkers are being developed to quantify joint remodelling and disease progression. This article was prepared following a working meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis convened to discuss the value of biochemical markers of matrix metabolism in drug development in osteoarthritis. The best candidates are generally molecules or molecular fragments present in cartilage, bone or synovium and may be specific to one type of joint tissue or common to them all. Many currently investigated biomarkers are associated with collagen metabolism in cartilage or bone, or aggrecan metabolism in cartilage. Other biomarkers are related to non-collagenous proteins, inflammation and/or fibrosis. Biomarkers in osteoarthritis can be categorised using the burden of disease, investigative, prognostic, efficacy of intervention, diagnostic and safety classification. There are a number of promising candidates, notably urinary C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II and serum cartilage oligomeric protein, although none is sufficiently discriminating to differentiate between individual patients and controls (diagnostic) or between patients with different disease severities (burden of disease), predict prognosis in individuals with or without osteoarthritis (prognostic) or perform so consistently that it could function as a surrogate outcome in clinical trials (efficacy of intervention). Future avenues for research include exploration of underlying mechanisms of disease and development of new biomarkers; technological development; the 'omics' (genomics, metabolomics, proteomics and lipidomics); design of aggregate scores combining a panel of biomarkers and/or imaging markers into single diagnostic algorithms; and investigation into the relationship between biomarkers and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据