4.5 Article

Preparation and properties investigation of PMMA/silica composites derived from silicic acid

期刊

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 84-91

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.1226

关键词

silica; silicic acid; PMMA; composite; mechanical properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [20476065, 20736004]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for the ROCs of State Education Ministry (SRF for ROCS, SEM)
  3. Key Laboratory of Multiphase Reaction of the Chinese Academy of Science [2006-5]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion of CAS [2006-902]
  5. Key Laboratory of Organic Synthesis of Jiangsu Province
  6. Chemical Experiment Center of Soochow University and R&D Foundation of Nanjing Medical University [NY0586]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid materials based on silicic acid and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) were prepared by in situ bulk polymerization of a silicic acid sol and MMA mixture. Silicic acid sol was obtained by tetrahydrofuran (THF) extraction of silicic acid from water. Silicic acid was prepared by hydrolysis and condensation of sodium silicate in the presence of 3.6 M HCI. As a comparative study, PMMA composites filled by silica particles, which were derived from calcining the silicic acid gel, were prepared by a comparable in situ polymerization. Each set of PMMA/silica composites was subjected to thermal and mechanical studies. Residual THF in PMMA/silicic acid composites impacted the properties of the polymer composites. With increase in silica content, the PMMA composites filled with silica particles showed improved thermal and mechanical properties, whereas a decrease in thermal stability and mechanical strength was found for PMMA composites filled with silicic acid dissolved in THF. With a better compatibility with polymer matrix, silicic acid sol shows better reinforcement than silica particles in PMMA films prepared via blending of the corresponding THF solutions. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据