4.5 Article

Microwave step-growth polymerization of 5-(4-methyl-2-phthalimidylpentanoylamino)isophthalic acid with different diisocyanates

期刊

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 1334-1342

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.1142

关键词

microwave-assisted; diisocyanate; optically active polymers; TGA; polycondensation; polyamides; green chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The utilization of microwave energy in polymer synthesis is a fast growing field of research leading to a more rapid and cleaner polymerization process. In order to synthesize novel optically active monomer 5-(4-methyl-2-phthalimidylpentanoylamino)isophthalic acid (6), the reaction of phthalic anhydride with L-leucine was carried out in an acetic acid solution and 4-methyl-2-phthalimidylpentanoic acid as an imide acid was obtained in good yield. Then, it was converted to 4-methyl-2-phthalimidylpentanoyl chloride by treatment with thionyl chloride. This acid chloride was reacted with 5-aminoisophthalic acid and the novel bulky aromatic amide-imide chiral monomer 6 was obtained in high yield and was characterized with spectroscopy techniques as well as specific rotation and elemental analysis. Polycondensation of monomer 6 with different diisocyanates such as 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate), toluene-2,4-diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, and hexamethylene diisocyanate was performed by two different methods: microwave irradiation and classical heating polymerization techniques in the presence of various catalysts and without a catalyst. The microwave polymerization technique provides a new way for the production of polymers at high rates. The resulting novel optically active polyamides have inherent viscosities in the range of 0.25-0.63 dl/g. They show good thermal stability and are soluble in amide-type solvents. The obtained polyamides were characterized by FT-IR, H-1-NMR spectroscopy, elemental analyses, specific rotation, and thermal analyses methods. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据