4.4 Article

Physical, optical and gas transport properties of new processable polyimides and poly(amideimide)s obtained from 4,4′-[oxybis(4,1-phenylenethio)]dianiline and aromatic dianhydrides

期刊

POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 621-629

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pj.2011.28

关键词

gas transport properties; optical properties; polyimides; sulfur-containing polyimides

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [N N209 086 138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aromatic diamine 4,4'-[oxybis(4,1-phenylenethio)]dianiline and various dianhydrides with isopropylidene, hexafluoroisopropylidene, fluorenylidene diphenyl, ether, thioether and/or amide linkages were applied in a polycondensation reaction to obtain new processable polyimides and poly(amideimide)s (PIs). PIs were synthesized by the conventional two-step procedure of ring-opening polyaddition and subsequent thermal cyclic dehydration. The structures of the polymers were characterized with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The thermal behaviors of the PIs were characterized with differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. The glass transition temperature (T-g) of the PIs were in the range of 175-298 degrees C and depended on the dianhydride used. The 5% weight loss temperatures were in the range of 423-515 degrees C, which shows the high thermal resistance characteristics of the PI. The optical absorption properties in the UV-visible range of the obtained polymers were studied in solution and in the solid state. The average refractive indices (n) of the PI films measured at the low absorption range were in the range of 1.96-1.50. The permeation properties of the PIs were studied for He, O-2, N-2 and CO2 at 6 atm, with a constant pressure/variable volume setup. The hexafluoroisopropylidene-based PI showed the largest permeability for all gases. Polymer Journal (2011) 43, 621-629; doi:10.1038/pj.2011.28; published online 20 April 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据