4.5 Article

pH-Responsive PEGylated nanoparticles based on amphiphilic polyaspartamide: preparation, physicochemical characterization and in vitro evaluation

期刊

POLYMER INTERNATIONAL
卷 62, 期 8, 页码 1218-1224

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pi.4412

关键词

stimuli-responsive; nanoparticle; polyaspartamide; amphiphilic; drug delivery

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012-0002773]
  3. Korean-Hungarian Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement [2010-00667]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-00667] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of amphiphilic graft copolymers based on polyaspartamide were synthesized by successive aminolysis reactions of polysuccinimide using 2-diisopropylaminoethyl (DIP), O-(2-aminoethyl)-O'-methylpolyethylene glycol (PEG) and lauryl amine as pH-sensitive, hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups, respectively. The pH-dependent self-assembly behavior of the aqueous copolymer solution was investigated. Nano-aggregation, which was induced by a hydrophilic/hydrophobic shift of the DIP group in solution, occurred at a pH in the vicinity of the pK(a) of the DIP group. The mean diameter of the nano-aggregate could be modulated by changing the compositions of both pendants. The mean diameter of the nanoparticles increased with increasing solution pH from 6.5 to 8. The dissolution of paclitaxel into these amphiphilic nanoparticles was attempted and the pH-dependent release behavior was examined using a solvent-casting method. The results showed a significantly faster release of paclitaxel at pH = 6.5, which is a tumoral acidic pH, than at neutral physiological pH. These pH-sensitive PEGylated polyaspartamide derivatives have potential use as a tumor-targeting delivery system. (C) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据