4.5 Article

Easily accessible oxygen-containing derivatives of niobium pentachloride as catalytic precursors for ethylene polymerization

期刊

POLYMER INTERNATIONAL
卷 60, 期 12, 页码 1722-1727

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pi.3139

关键词

niobium; tantalum; early transition metal halides; coordination compounds; O-ligands; ethylene polymerization

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR, Roma)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The low catalytic activity of NbCl5 as an ethylene polymerization catalyst was significantly increased by the addition of a series of oxygen donors. The novel niobium derivatives NbCl5(OPh2) (1), NbCl5(OEt2) (3), NbCl5(O=CPh2) (5), NbCl5(O=CHPh) (6), NbCl5(O=CHMe) (7) and [NbCl4(dppe)(2)](NbCl6) (18) (dppe is 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino) ethane) and the previously reported derivatives NbCl5(OMePh) (2), NbCl5(thf) (4) (thf is tetrahydrofuran), NbCl5(O=CHOMe) (8), NbCl5(O=CHNMe2) (9), NbCl5[O=C(NMe2)(2)] (10), NbCl5(NCMe) (11), NbCl4(kappa(2)-1,2-OC6H4OMe) (12), NbCl4[kappa(2)-O=C(Me)CH2C(Me-2)O] (13), [NbCl4(thf)[<(O(CH2)(4)O(CH2)(3)C)over bar>H-2][NbCl6] (14), [NbCl4(O2CMe)](2) (15), NbCl3(dme)(mu-O)NbCl5 (16) (dme is 1,2-dimethoxyethane), [NbCl4(kappa(2)-dmm)(2)](NbCl6) (17) (dmm is dimethylmaleate), TaCl5(O=CMe2) (19) and [TaCl4(O2CMe)](2) (20) were tested as catalytic precursors in the ethylene polymerization reaction using AlMe3-depleted methylaluminoxane as co-catalyst. Highly linear polyethylene was obtained. Compounds 1, 3, 5, 6 and 8-13 showed catalytic activities in the range 89-116 kg(polymer) mol(Nb)(-1) h(-1) bar(-1), i.e. comparable with the best performances reached with niobium pre-catalysts up to now. However, the dinuclear compounds 14-16 and 18 were found to be less active, whereas 17 and the tantalum derivatives 19 and 20 did not produce polymer. Relatively high molecular weights were achieved with the mononuclear compounds 1, 2, 8, 9, 10 and 12, the dinuclear 16 and the phosphine ionic 18. (C) 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据