4.5 Article

Mechanistic Aspects of Silane Coupling Agents With Different Functionalities on Reinforcement of Silica-Filled Natural Rubber Compounds

期刊

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 836-842

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pen.23949

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Netherlands Natural Rubber Foundation (Rubber Stichting)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silane coupling agents containing different specific functionalities are studied to gain understanding of their roles in silica-filled natural rubber (NR) compounds. Five different silane coupling agents, that is bis-(triethoxysilylpropyl) tetrasulfide (TESPT), bis-(triethoxysilylpropyl) disulfide (TESPD), octyltriethoxysilane, vinyltrimethoxysilane, and bis-(trimethyl-silylmethyl) tetrasulfide (TMSMT), are comparatively investigated, by taking the most commonly used TESPT as a reference. The results reveal that alkoxy-based silanes can effectively reduce the filler-filler interaction and lower compound viscosity owing to the effect of silane-to-silica hydrophobation which contributes to better compatibility between silica and NR. The alkoxy-silanes with a sulfur moiety, that is TESPT and TESPD, show more pronounced improvement in overall properties as a result of filler-rubber interactions. The use of TMSMT which has no alkoxy groups but contains only a sulfur moiety elucidates that there are three reaction mechanisms involved in systems with sulfur-alkoxy-based silane. These are as follows: (1) the silane-to-silica or silanization/hydrophobation reaction; (2) the silane-to-rubber or coupling reaction; and (3) rubber-rubber crosslinking originating from active sulfur released by the polysulfide-based silane TESPT. These simultaneous reactions are temperature dependent, and show an optimum level at a dump temperature of approximately 140-150 degrees C, as depicted by filler-filler and filler-rubber interactions, as well as mechanical properties of such compounds. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 55:836-842, 2015. (c) 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据