4.7 Article

Enhanced thermo-oxidative aging resistance of EPDM at high temperature by using synergistic antioxidants

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.037

关键词

EPDM; Thermo-oxidative aging; ZDMA; antioxidant; Synergistic effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51221002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, zinc dimethacrylate (ZDMA) and 2-sulfur-benzimidazole (MB)/N-4(phenyl pheny1)-maleimide (MC) were simultaneously used as synergistic antioxidants to improve the thermo-oxidative aging resistance of peroxide vulcanized ethylene-propylene-diene monomer (EPDM) for its application at high temperature. For comparison purpose, the control sample without antioxidants, the traditional antioxidant package, the combined antioxidant MB/MC, and pure ZDMA were also investigated. The results showed that the crosslinking density of EPDM was only slightly decreased before aging by using the combined antioxidant MB/MC/ZDMA, and the increase in crosslinking density was much less than other antioxidants at the same aging time, indicating the largely improved aging resistance of EPDM. As a result, the change in mechanical properties was the lowest for EPDM with the combined antioxidant MB/ MC/ZDMA at high temperature. Meanwhile, the results from structure analysis showed that the degree of oxidation of EPDM was much lower than other systems after aging at 180 degrees C for 216 h by using the combined antioxidant MB/MC/ZDMA. In addition, the surfaces of EPDM samples with MB/MC/ZDMA as synergistic antioxidants or the combined antioxidant MB/MC were still smooth after aging at 180 degrees C for 216 h, whereas severe cracks occurred for other antioxidative systems. These results suggest the good thermo-oxidative aging resistance of the synergistic antioxidant MB/MC/ZDMA. Finally, the synergistic antioxidative mechanism of MB/MC/ZDMA was carefully discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据