4.7 Article

Flame retardancy and synergistic flame retardant mechanisms of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene composites based on aluminum hypophosphite

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 265-276

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.04.011

关键词

ABS; Flame retardancy; Aluminum hypophosphite; Synergistic agent; Flame retardant mechanisms

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21104038]
  2. scientific research foundation of Shandong province [2010BSE08010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of flame retardant acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer (FR ABS) composites were prepared by melt blending using aluminum hypophosphite (AHP) and melamine cyanurate (MCA) or silicone flame retardant (SiFR) as synergistic flame retardant. The thermal behavior, flame retardancy of FR ABS composites were investigated by thermogravimetric (TGA), the UL-94 vertical burning test, limiting oxygen index (LOI) and cone calorimeter test. The FR ABS composite showed good flame retardancy, from no vertical rating of ABS to V-0 rating of FR ABS containing 25 wt% AHP in the UL-94 test. The results showed that ABS/22wt%AHP composites presented lower peak heat release rate (PHRR), lower total heat release (THR) and higher char residue (CR) than those for ABS. Adding small amount of MCA or SiFR, PHRR and THR values for ABS/20wt%AHP/2wt%MCA and ABS/20w%AHP/2wt% SiFR composites decreased compared with ABS/22wt%AHP composite, which indicated that the incorporation of MCA or SiFR led to a synergistic effect on the ABS/AHP flame retardant composites. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) measurement results showed that the residual structure for ABS/20wt%AHP/2wt%MCA and ABS/20wt%AHP/2wt%SiFR composites presented very different surface morphology and surface element composition, which were attributed to different synergistic flame retardant mechanisms. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据