4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Measurement of kinetics and thermodynamics of the thermal degradation for charring polymers

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 2-15

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.09.022

关键词

Thermal decomposition; Heat of gasification; Pyrolysis modeling; Thermogravimetric analysis; Differential scanning calorimetry; Engineering plastics

资金

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology [60NANB10D0226]
  2. NSF
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1347196] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work was focused on developing and applying a systematic methodology for the measurement of kinetics and thermodynamics of the thermal degradation of polymeric materials. This methodology employed a simultaneous thermal analysis instrument capable of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). A numerical model was utilized to fit thermogravimetric data to obtain thermal degradation kinetics. This model was subsequently employed to analyze DSC heat flow and extract sensible, melting and decomposition reaction heats. The extracted set of kinetic and thermodynamic parameters was shown to simultaneously reproduce TGA and DSC curves. In the current study, this methodology was applied to polymers that produce a significant amount of carbon rich residue (char) upon thermal decomposition. The analyzed materials were a poly(methyl methaciylate) poly(vinyl chloride) alloy (Kydex), polymerized diglycidylether of bisphenol A, poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(paraphenylene terephthalamide) (Kevlar), polymerized bisphenol A cyanate ester, poly(phenylene sulfide), polyetherimide and poly(ether ether ketone). The materials that produced less than 40 wt.% of char upon decomposition were found to decompose endothermically. The materials whose char yield exceeded 40 wt.% were found to undergo an exothermic decomposition. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据