4.7 Article

Plasma activated polymers grafted with cysteamine improving surfaces cytocompatibility

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.024

关键词

Polymer surfaces; Plasma treatment; Cysteamine grafting; Cytocompatibility; Cells adhesion and proliferation; Surface properties

资金

  1. GACR [13-06609S, P108/10/1106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cysteamine was grafted on polymer foils (poly L-lactic acid, polystyrene, low and high density polyethylenes, polyethyleneterephthalate, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyvinylfluoride and polyvinylidene-fluoride) previously treated (activated) in plasma discharge. Grafting of cysteamine on polymer surface is expected to provide a new material applicable in medicine treatment. Properties of the sample surfaces change significantly before and after plasma treatment and cysteamine grafting and they were studied using various methods to characterize changes in surface chemistry, polarity, wetability, etc. Surface chemistry was studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, chemistry and polarity by electrokinetic analysis and by goniometry, roughness and morphology by atomic force microscopy. Representatives of unmodified and modified polymers were used for in vitro study of adhesion and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Plasma treatment and cysteamine grafting improve dramatically surface cytocompatibility. Electrokinetic analysis and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed the cysteamine bonds to polymer surfaces via opposite functional groups (-SH or -NH2) depending on chemistry and polarity of polymers under study. This preferential grafting influence an adhesion and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells significantly. Even cytocompatibility of plasma treated polytetrafluoroethylene and subsequently grafted with cysteamine is better in comparison with tissue culture polystyrene. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据