4.7 Article

Biosynthesis and characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoate containing 5-hydroxyvalerate units: Effects of 5HV units on biodegradability, cytotoxicity, mechanical and thermal properties

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 331-338

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.09.008

关键词

Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA); 5-hydroxyvalerate (5HV); Biomaterial; Lipase-mediated degradation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [23760757]
  2. RIKEN Biomass Engineering Program
  3. USM fellowship scheme
  4. RIKEN International Program Associate
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24651090, 23760757, 23310059] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) containing 5-hydroxyvalerate (5HV) units. Monomer units like 5HV, with variation in length of the backbone segment of the repeat unit, are known to more greatly impact mechanical properties of polymers. Introduction of 5HV units was also aimed at enhancing biodegradability of the material, as it had been found previously that a homopolymer of 5HV could be degraded by lipase. The produced poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxypropionate-co-5-hydroxyvalerate]s [P(3HB-co-3HP-co-5HV)s] with 5HV content ranging from 1 to 32 mol% by the choice of strain, type and concentration of carbon substrate, exhibited low melting temperature (T-m), reduced crystallinity and elastomeric behavior. Enzymatic degradation test confirmed the role of 5HV unit in enabling lipase-mediated degradation of P(3HB-co-3HP-co-5HV)s, as poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] and poly[(R)-3-hydroxypropionatel films were not hydrolyzed by porcine pancreas lipase. Additionally, viability assay of human mesenchymal stem cells revealed that the P(3HB-co-3HP-co-5HV) films were less cytotoxic and supported cell proliferation, highlighting the potential of P(3HB-co-3HP-co-5HV)s as biomaterials. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据