4.7 Article

The water vapour adsorption-desorption behaviour of naturally aged Tilia cordata Mill. wood

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 98, 期 9, 页码 1804-1813

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.05.021

关键词

Dynamic water vapour sorption; Tilia cordata wood; Parallel exponential kinetic (PEK) model; Sorption isotherm

资金

  1. Scottish Funding Council
  2. Royal Society of Edinburgh
  3. Joint Research Institute for Civil and Environmental Engineering of the Edinburgh Research Partnership

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect caused by the natural ageing of wood on the sorption properties during two consecutive sorption cycles of historical Tilia cordata Mill. wood has been investigated and compared with a reference sample. Differences were found in the sorption isotherm between the first and second sorption cycles for most of the samples and also between the reference and historical wood. All samples exhibited sorption hysteresis, but with important differences in behaviour observed with the historic wood samples. It was interesting to note that the oldest historic wood sample did not display any discernible difference between the first and second sorption cycle throughout much of the hygroscopic range and also exhibited absolute hysteresis values essentially identical with the reference sample. These results indicate that the sorption behaviour of wood is dependent upon the previous exposure of the wood to atmospheric relative humidity. The sorption kinetics was also analysed in terms of the parallel exponential kinetics (PEK) model, and excellent fits to the data were obtained. The PEK model describes the dynamic sorption behaviour in terms of a fast and slow kinetic process and important differences in behaviour for these two processes were found. It is thought that the fast process is associated with a physical diffusion phenomenon, while the slow kinetics process is considered to be associated with cell wall matrix polymer relaxation processes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据