4.7 Article

Flame retardancy and thermal decomposition of flexible polyurethane foams: Structural influence of organophosphorus compounds

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 97, 期 11, 页码 2428-2440

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.019

关键词

Foam; Flame retardant; Phosphate; Phosphonate; Phosphoramidate; PO

资金

  1. Foampartner, Switzerland
  2. CTI, commission for technology and innovation, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study the structural effect of different phosphorus compounds on the flame retardant (FR) properties of flexible polyurethane foams (FPUF) was investigated. A series of organophosphorus compounds (phosphonates, phosphates and phosphoramidates) with systematical structure variations were synthesized and incorporated into the flexible foam during its polymerization process. The flame-retarding efficiency of these phosphorus compounds was subsequently evaluated by subjecting their corresponding flame-retarded foams to standard fire tests such as limiting oxygen index (LOI), BKZ-vertical burning test and UL 94-horizontal burning test for foamed materials. It was observed that the synthesized phosphonates and analogous phosphoramidates were more effective than the corresponding phosphates. The presence of an allyl moiety within the molecular structure further improved the FR efficacy of the phosphonate and phosphoramidate compounds, whereas a benzyl group reduced the flame retardant efficiency significantly. The thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis and pyrolysis combustion flow calorimetry (PCFC) results for the FPUF indicated that the most effective FRs might act predominantly in gas phase and exhibit lower condensed phase action (i.e. catalyze the decomposition of FPUF to happen at lower temperatures). Mass spectrometric analysis of FRs indicates that phosphonate and phosphoramidate derivatives appear to support the phosphoryl radical formation more than the investigated phosphate compounds. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据