4.7 Article

An Investigation on the Rheology, Morphology, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Recycled Poly (ethylene terephthalate) Reinforced With Modified Short Glass Fibers

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 993-999

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.20647

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work was done with the aim to solve an important environmental issue regarding poly (ethylene terephthalate), (PET) wastes. Samples of recycled PET (r-PET) were reinforced with 10 to 30 wt% modified short glass fibers (SGF) through a melt mixing process in an internal mixer and their performance were assessed and compared with those of commercial glass reinforced PET through investigation of their rheology, morphology, thermal, and mechanical properties. It was found that the mechanical properties of the glass reinforced r-PET composites in most cases were comparable or even higher than those of the commercial grades. The impact strength of the 30 wt% SGF filled r-PET composite was about 30% higher than the commercial grades. This led to a conclusion that the PET wastes can be successfully converted to easily moldable thermoplastic materials by incorporation of 30 wt% SGF having a good balance of properties. Through investigation of rheological and morphological properties the optimum conditions for the best reinforcement performance were determined. The r-PET with 30 wt% glass fiber content showed the highest level of orientation and improved interaction with the r-PET matrix while having an acceptable flow behavior and processability. In spite of significant fiber breakage during the melt mixing process, leading to about 20 times reduction in the fiber aspect ratio, the composites maintained their good mechanical properties and showed a shear thinning behavior at high shear rates. The incorporated glass fibers acted as nucleating agents and improved the crystallization rate of r-PET leading to an overall increase in the crystallinity. POLYM. COMPOS., 30:993-999, 2009. (C) 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据