4.7 Article

Multiple responsive hydrogel films based on dynamic Schiff base linkages

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 5, 期 24, 页码 7081-7089

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4py00868e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21174070, 21274068, 21228401, 21374048]
  2. Tianjin Public Health Bureau [13KG110]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0264]
  4. PCSIRT program [IRT1257]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stimuli-responsive hydrogels whose swelling degree changes in response to certain external stimulus are usually constructed by the introduction of a functional group. Here we show that they can also be constructed using dynamic bonds as crosslinks because the equilibrium of their formation and breakage can be shifted by external stimuli. As an example, hydrogel films were fabricated from partially oxidized dextran (PO-Dex) and chitosan (Chi) using the layer-by-layer assembly technique. The driving force for the film buildup is the in situ formation of Schiff base bonds between the aldehyde groups on PO-Dex and amino groups on Chi. The swelling of the film was studied using the Fabry-Perot fringes on the reflection spectra. Like ordinary hydrogels, the PO-Dex/Chi hydrogel films swell in water. Their swelling degree decreases with increasing oxidation degree of PO-Dex. The films swell to a larger degree when the pH is lowered. The pH-sensitivity was attributed to amino groups on chitosan and also the dynamic Schiff base linkages, because pH change shifts the equilibrium of the Schiff base reaction in the films, resulting in a change in the crosslink density and therefore a change in swelling degree. When the transient linkages were fixed by NaBH4 reduction, the pH-sensitivity of the films was significantly reduced. The films were found to be sensitive to other external stimuli, including temperature, L-lysine and pyridoxal. These stimuli-responsivities were also attributed to the dynamic Schiff base linkages in the film.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据