4.7 Article

A branching point thermo and pH dual-responsive hyperbranched polymer based on poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) and poly(N,N-diethyl aminoethyl methacrylate)

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 4, 期 9, 页码 2850-2863

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3py00218g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21004049]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation for Specialized Funded Project [201003684]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of the Ministry of Education [20106102120053]
  4. NPU Fundamental Research Foundation [JC201270]
  5. Program of Youth Science and Technology Nova of the Shaanxi province of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the design and synthesis of a branching point stimuli-responsive hyperbranched polymer based on poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) and poly(N,N-diethylaminoethyl methacrylate) through combined A(2) + BxC (x > 2) double monomer polymerization and parallel click reaction. The results of ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry and dynamic light scattering (DLS) indicated that the resultant hyperbranched polymer possesses thermo and pH dual-responsive properties and presents gradient phase transition behaviors under appropriate solution pH and temperature conditions. The dual-responsive properties are independent of the two grafted linear polymer components and hyperbranched structure. Interestingly, fluorescence spectrophotometry studies have revealed that hyperbranched polymer aqueous solutions show different encapsulation behaviors toward water-soluble methyl orange or oil-soluble lonidamine molecules below and above the critical micelle concentration (CMC). The different aggregation states of hyperbranched polymers with different encapsulation microenvironments, such as dot-like unimolecular micelles below CMC and spherical multimolecular micelles above CMC, were confirmed via DLS and transmission electron microscopy. The aggregation states directly indicated the level of encapsulation ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据