4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of highly pure block copolymers by combination of RAFT polymerization, click reaction and de-grafting process

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 1803-1812

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1py00396h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20844001, 20874067, 21074081]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile strategy for synthesizing highly pure block copolymers with polymeric segments such as polystyrene, polyacrylamides and polyacrylates was described. The methodology involves a grafting reaction by tandem RAFT polymerization and azide-alkyne cycloaddition reaction and a subsequent de-grafting reaction via aminolysis or radical-induced addition-fragmentation reaction. S-methoxycarbonylphenylmethyl S'-propynyloxycarbonylethyltrithiocarbonate was used to synthesize Z-alkyne-functionalized macro chain transfer agents, and silica particles grafted with well-defined living block copolymers were obtained by simultaneous RAFT process and click reaction using clickable RAFT agents and azido-functionalized silica particles as raw materials. This approach afforded grafted polymers with polydispersity typically lower than 1.2 and silica-polymer hybrids with grafting density in the range of 0.020-0.091 chains nm(-2) as the grafted chains had molecular weights between 4920 and 26 300 g mol(-1). Highly pure block copolymers with terminal functionalities such as thiol, methyldithio, carboxyl, hydroxyl and halogen were obtained by a de-grafting process and postmodification, and azido-functionalized silica particles were efficiently recovered. The cycles of grafting and de-grafting reactions could be applied many times, and no significant decrease in grafting density was noted, indicating the versatility and generality of this approach for surface modification, synthesis of high-purity block copolymers and recycling of clickable solid substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据