4.7 Article

Effect of cross-linker length on the thermal and volumetric properties of cross-linked epoxy networks: A molecular simulation study

期刊

POLYMER
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 1015-1019

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.051

关键词

Molecular simulation; Cross-linked epoxy; Glass transition temperature

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research (ONR) [N00014-09-1-0626]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Volumetric and thermal properties of cross-linked epoxy systems consisting of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) and poly(oxypropylene) (POP) diamines of four different lengths ranging from 3 to 68 units were investigated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The cross-linked structures were built by using the simulated annealing polymerization approach. The density, coefficients of volume thermal expansion and glass transition temperature (T-g) of each of the four cross-linked epoxy systems were obtained from their volume temperature behavior. The density obtained in the simulations agreed well with the experimental value, whereas the coefficients of volume thermal expansion were at least 30% lower than their corresponding experimental results. The predicted T-g values were higher than the experimental values due to the considerably faster cooling rates that are used in the simulations. It was observed that an increase in the chain length of the cross-linker POP-diamines led to a larger difference between the predicted and experimental values of T-g. Three different approaches were used to estimate the expected shift in the experimental T-g to higher values had these measurements been made at cooling rates comparable to those used in MD simulations. It is shown that, in general, the T-g values obtained in MD simulations are consistent with such shifted T-g values that account for the difference in the cooling rates, although no one particular shift approach worked well for all four epoxy systems studied. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据