4.7 Article

Composites of polyamide 6 and silicate nanotubes of the mineral halloysite: Influence of molecular weight on thermal, mechanical and rheological properties

期刊

POLYMER
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 2690-2699

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.041

关键词

Nanocomposites; Halloysite; Mechanical reinforcement

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [AL 474/13-1]
  2. Imerys Tableware Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the potential of silicate nanotubes of the naturally occurring mineral halloysite as filler for polyamide 6 (PA 6) nanocomposites is evaluated. Several PA 6/halloysite composites with 0 wt% to 30 wt % filler loading using two different grades of PA 6 were prepared. In order to elucidate the influence of molecular weight on the properties of the nanocomposites, mechanical resp. rheological experiments (i) below the glass transition temperature T-g of PA 6, (ii) between T-g and the melting temperature T-m of PA 6 and (iii) above T-m were performed. Our investigations reveal that the addition of halloysite nanotubes favours the formation of the gamma-modification for the low molar mass PA 6. Furthermore, the storage modulus, the tensile modulus and the yield stress of the composites increase with concentration of halloysite, an effect which is strongly pronounced at very low filler fractions for the low molar mass PA 6 composites. The increase of the storage modulus which was measured in dynamic-mechanical experiments is mostly dominant in the temperature interval from 55 degrees C to 100 degrees C, i.e. above the glass transition temperature of PA 6. Rheological investigations showed that the shear viscosity is only moderately increased by the addition of a low fraction of halloysite to PA 6, and nanocomposites with 30 wt% halloysite can be still processed. In summary, halloysite nanotubes are promising and inexpensive candidates for increasing the stiffness of PA 6 while maintaining very good flow properties. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据