4.7 Article

A biomimic shape memory polymer based self-healing particulate composite

期刊

POLYMER
卷 51, 期 25, 页码 6021-6029

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.021

关键词

Shape memory polymer; Self-healing; Structural damage

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI 0946740, CMMI 0900064]
  2. Louisiana Board of Regents
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [0900064] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a previous study, a biomimic two-step self-healing scheme (close-then-heal (CTH)) by mimicking human skin has been proposed for self-healing structural-length scale damage [Li and Uppu. Composites Science and Technology 2010; 70: 1419-1427]. The purpose of this study is to validate this idea by fabricating a composite with thermoplastic particles (Copolyster) dispersed in a shape memory polymer matrix (Veirflex Polystyrene). In this particulate composite, the confined shape recovery of the shape memory matrix is utilized for sealing (closing) cracks and the thermoplastic particles are used for molecular-length scale healing. In this study, 6% by volume of thermoplastic particles was used. Beam specimens were prepared and programmed by compression in the longitudinal direction to 6.7% of prestrain. Structural-length scale damage was then created by producing a notch in the programmed beam specimens per ASTM D 5045. The notched beam specimens were then tested to fracture. The fractured specimens were healed per the close-then-heal mechanism and tested again to fracture. This fracture-healing test lasted for 5 cycles. The healing efficiency was evaluated per the peak-bending load. SEM was used to examine healed cracks at micro-length scale while EDS was used to evaluate molecular-length scale healing. It is found that over 65% of the peak bending load can be repeatedly recovered and the structural-length scale damage (notch) is healed at molecular-length scale. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据