4.7 Article

Glass transition behavior and dynamic fragility in polylactides containing mobile and rigid amorphous fractions

期刊

POLYMER
卷 49, 期 20, 页码 4427-4432

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.08.012

关键词

poly(L-lactide); poly(D,L-lactide); crystalline confinement

资金

  1. Basque Government Department of Education, University and Research [GIC07/136-IT-339-07]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [MAT 2006-13436-CO2-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The segmental dynamics of polylactide chains covering the T-g - 30 degrees C to T-g + 30 degrees C range was studied in absence and presence of a crystalline phase by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) using the framework provided by the WLF theory and the Angell's dynamic fragility concept. An appropriate selection of stereoisomers combined with a thermal conditioning strategy to promote crystallization (above T-g) or relaxation of chains (below Tg) was revealed as an efficient method to tune the ratio of the rigid and mobile amorphous phases in polylactides. A single bulklike mobile amorphous phase was taken for poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA). In turn three phases, comprising a mobile amorphous fraction (MAF, X-MA), a rigid amorphous fraction (RAF, X-RA) and a crystalline fraction (X-c) were determined in poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) by modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC) according to a three-phase model. The analysis of results confirms that crystallinity and RAF not only elevate the Tg and the breadth of the glass transition region but also yields an increase in dynamic fragility parameter (m) which entails the existence of a smaller length-scale of cooperativity of polylactide chains in confined environments. Consequently it is proposed that crystallinity is acting in polymeric systems as a topological constraint that, preventing longer range dynamics, provides a faster segmental dynamics by the temperature dependence of relaxation times according to the strong-fragile scheme. @ 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据